STJD prosecutor denounces Sport; Vasco can benefit

The Attorney of the Superior Court of Sports Justice (STJD) denounced Sport for the confusion in the game against Vasco, last Sunday, on Ilha do Retiro. The club was framed in three articles of the Brazilian Sports Justice Code (211, 213 and 205 §1) and in two of the General Regulations of Competitions of the CBF (19 and 20). The latter can declare Leão as the loser of the match, which would give Cruz-Maltino two more points in the Serie B classification.

+ Vasco keeps distance to Sport: see the chances of access in Serie B at the end of the 35th round

In addition to the complaints, the Attorney General’s Office filed an injunction asking for the interdiction of Ilha do Retiro. Other claims are that Sport plays behind closed doors in home matches and is not entitled to tickets in away matches.

+ Check the classification of Serie B

The complaints are already in the electronic system of the STJD and should be judged next week. President Otávio Noronha has the preliminary injunctions in hand and should be analyzed in the coming days.

Sport x Vasco - Confusion on Ilha do Retiro

Sport fans invaded the lawn of Ilha do Retiro (reproduction / Sportv)

The articles that Sport was denounced:

General Regulations for CBF Competitions

Article 19 – A match can only be postponed, interrupted or suspended if at least one of the following reasons occurs:
I – lack of security;
V – conflicts or serious disturbances on the field or in the stadium;

Article 20 – When the match is suspended for any of the reasons provided for in art. 19 of this RGC, this will be done after judgment of the corresponding case by the STJD:
I – if the Club that caused the suspension of the match was winning or the match was tied, such Club will be declared a loser by the score of 3 to 0 (three to zero);

Brazilian Code of Sports Justice

Article 205 – Prevent the continuation of the match, event or equivalent that is being disputed, due to the intentional insufficiency of its athletes or in any other way.
FEATHER: fine, from R$ 100 to R$ 100 thousand, and loss of points in dispute in favor of the opponent, in accordance with the regulations.
Paragraph 1 The sporting entity is subject to the penalties of this article if the suspension of the match has been proven to be caused or provoked by its fans.

Article 211 – Failing to maintain the location that you have indicated for the event with the necessary infrastructure to ensure full guarantee and safety for its realization.
FEATHER: fine, from R$ 100 to R$ 100 thousand, and interdiction of the place, when applicable, until the requirements contained in the decision are satisfied.

Article 213 – Failure to take measures capable of preventing and repressing:
I – disorders in your sports venue;
II – invasion of the field or place of the sporting event;
III – throwing objects on the field or place of the sporting event.
FEATHER: fine, from BRL 100 to BRL 100 thousand.

Paragraph 1 When the disorder, invasion or launch of an object is of high severity or causes damage to the progress of the sporting event, the practice entity may be punished with the loss of command of the field from one to ten matches, events or equivalent, when participating of the official competition.

Paragraph 2 If the disorder, invasion or launch of an object is carried out by the opposing entity’s fans, both the host entity and the opposing entity will be punishable, but only when proven that they also contributed to the fact.

Source link

About Admin

Check Also

Crespo says what he thinks of Brazil’s dances at the World Cup and pinpoints who he will support if Argentina is eliminated

Hernán Crespo gave an interview to ESPN directly from Doha, Qatar, and talked about the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *